{"id":386,"date":"2016-10-14T23:13:00","date_gmt":"2016-10-15T05:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/?p=386"},"modified":"2020-02-04T23:29:51","modified_gmt":"2020-02-05T05:29:51","slug":"the-incoherence-of-wayne-grudem-on-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/?p=386","title":{"rendered":"The Incoherence of Wayne Grudem on Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A buddy disagreed with my last post and said that I was too smart to fall for the idea that Christians should vote for Trump.&nbsp; I smilingly replied that one should avoid the term \u201ctoo smart\u201d when disagreeing with the likes of theologian Wayne Grudem, whom I\u2019d mentioned as an advocate of the position I was taking.&nbsp; Grudem is scary smart.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the end of last July, Grudem published his now-famous article \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/?page_id=388\">Why Voting for Donald Trump Is a Morally Good Choice<\/a>.\u201d\u00a0 He stated the essence of the article in an early paragraph:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>I did not support Trump in the primary season. I even spoke against him at a pastors\u2019 conference in February. But now I plan to vote for him. I do not think it is right to call him an \u201cevil candidate.\u201d I think rather he is a good candidate with flaws.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>This article provoked a firestorm of opposing articles, blog posts, etc. in the Christian cybersphere.&nbsp; After reading about ten of them, I saw that I could dispense with the other two hundred; they all said the same things.&nbsp; A major objection was that Trump is bad&nbsp;<em>in a way that the world doesn\u2019t like<\/em>&nbsp;rather than, for instance, Hillary Clinton, who is bad in ways that the world celebrates.&nbsp; For nigh on seventy years, by my reckoning, Christian leaders have repeatedly been exclaiming \u201cOh, horrors! We can\u2019t do\/say\/think that!&nbsp; Why,&nbsp;<em>what would Satan say if we did that???<\/em>\u201d&nbsp; Subsequently, Christianity has become so conformed to the world now that its major distinguishing point seems to be how cheesy its rock &amp; roll is.&nbsp; So everybody jumped on Grudem (who, by the way, has a long history of standing against the decline of Christianity).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This presidential election campaign season has been the most entertaining carnival that has ever come to town. Repeatedly, when you think the show is over and you\u2019ve seen it all, another act comes dancing across the stage and the frolics resume.&nbsp; Last week the nation was shocked,&nbsp;<em>shocked!<\/em>&nbsp;to discover that Trump has lived as a sexual libertine who uses vulgar language as though he were a common plumbing contractor.&nbsp; True, he bragged about his behavior in his books and broadcast media appearances for decades, but the Democrat-media confederacy has somehow managed to republish the data with enough fanfare now to trick the booboisie into thinking it\u2019s a game-changing revelation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On cue, a swarm of Republicans called for Trump to withdraw from the race.\u00a0 Among them was Wayne Grudem.\u00a0 His explanation is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/townhall.com\/columnists\/waynegrudem\/2016\/10\/09\/trumps-moral-character-and-the-election-n2229846\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I\u2019ve never called Trump a good candidate with flaws (as Grudem did); I\u2019ve consistently called him a bad man who doesn\u2019t know much and isn\u2019t very smart.&nbsp; Despite that, my position is essentially the same as was Grudem\u2019s.&nbsp; He went to&nbsp;<em>great<\/em>&nbsp;lengths to demonstrate why a Trump administration would be preferable to a Clinton one.&nbsp; The voter is faced with the choice of favoring the better option or not favoring the better option.&nbsp; If he chooses to favor the better option, it will entail certain actions, although individuals&nbsp;<em>might<\/em>&nbsp;disagree over exactly what those actions are.&nbsp; (Ordinarily, the entailed action would be to support Trump.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This brings me to the accusation I make in this post\u2019s title.&nbsp; With his recent article, Grudem has adopted an incoherent position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He begins with a condemnation of Trump\u2019s 2005 remarks about sexual aggressiveness, and similar vulgarities on\u2013who would believe it?\u2013Howard Stern\u2019s radio show.&nbsp; Grudem states that such behavior is \u201chateful in God\u2019s eyes\u201d and that it \u201cturned my stomach.\u201d&nbsp; On these bases, he calls for Trump to withdraw.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So far, Grudem\u2019s position is coherent.&nbsp; Trump is, indeed, deplorable; and if a voter realizes that he no longer favors a candidate (be the epiphany ever so tardy), he is at liberty to favor a different outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, for the remainder of the article, Grudem restates the patently obvious fact that a Trump presidency is seriously preferable to its alternative.&nbsp;&nbsp; (And readers, please keep clearly in your logic the fact that Eggan McMuffin is not a third possibility.)&nbsp; He asserts that he cannot and will not vote for Clinton.&nbsp; In other words, Grudem as much as admits that his upset stomach hasn\u2019t changed&nbsp;<strong>anything<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Grudem himself, though, has indeed changed something: he has changed the vote of thousands of Christian fence-sitters who were looking for a leader to confirm their gut instinct that Trump is preferable to the alternative.&nbsp; Headlines immediately peppered the landscape announcing Grudem\u2019s great reversal, part of a much grander narrative that the Dems have pushed for four months\u2013that Trump is losing his support.&nbsp; In fact, Trump has gone up and down in the polls and the recent trends were upward, apparently because Ted Cruz and others were finally admitting that someone they deplored was, sad to say, their only hope for avoiding a Clinton presidency.&nbsp; Grudem\u2019s move served only to decelerate any momentum that the idea was gaining among Christians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That\u2019s what is incoherent about Grudem\u2019s present position.\u00a0 He avers (still) that a Trump presidency is a better option than its alternative, but his actions favor the alternative.\u00a0 To call upon Trump to withdraw is not an option because (1) obviously Trump will not and (2) if he did, his successor couldn\u2019t possibly fare as well; so such a call is substantially a move to favor what he claims not to favor.\u00a0 Even with the publishing of the vulgar recordings, and with the even more recent unsubstantiated (and highly suspicious) accusations of assaultive behavior, Grudem, I, and everyone else are left with the same choice we always had.\u00a0 We may favor one of only two outcomes (any third outcomes are imaginary).\u00a0 For weighty reasons (see\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/?page_id=388\">Grudem\u2019s original article<\/a>) the preferable outcome is a Trump election.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A buddy disagreed with my last post and said that I was too smart to fall for the idea that Christians should vote for Trump.&nbsp; I smilingly replied that one should avoid the term \u201ctoo smart\u201d when disagreeing with the likes of theologian Wayne Grudem, whom I\u2019d mentioned as an advocate of the position I &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/?p=386\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The Incoherence of Wayne Grudem on Trump&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p45dxY-6e","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=386"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/386\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":390,"href":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/386\/revisions\/390"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.barleyservices.biz\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}